Frequently Asked Questions: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
=== How do you know Peru analyzed the wrong specimens? === | === How do you know Peru analyzed the wrong specimens? === | ||
In 2023, a lawsuit was filed against the Ministry of Culture of Peru. During the legal proceedings, Flavio Estrada was compelled to testify and admitted that he had never seen, interacted with, or conducted any analysis on the authentic specimens. The lawsuit has since expanded to seek damages of up to $300 million against Peru and its Ministry of Culture for alleged defamation against the scientists from Jaime Maussan's team and Maussan himself. The current head of the Ministry of Culture, Leslie Urteaga, is also involved in the lawsuit due to actions that allegedly allowed the global proliferation of slander against the authentic specimens and the scientists studying them. The plaintiffs further allege that the Ministry of Culture omitted the fact that the person who provided the counterfeit objects had stated that they were artisanal objects. If awarded, the $300 million from the lawsuit will be used to fund the construction of a museum in the Palpa and Nazca regions of Peru, as requested by the plaintiff, Jaime Maussan, with the intention of benefiting the people of Peru and all of humanity. | In 2023, a lawsuit was filed against the Ministry of Culture of Peru. During the legal proceedings, Flavio Estrada was compelled to testify and admitted that he had never seen, interacted with, or conducted any analysis on the authentic specimens. The lawsuit has since expanded to seek damages of up to $300 million against Peru and its Ministry of Culture for alleged defamation against the scientists from Jaime Maussan's team and Maussan himself. The current head of the Ministry of Culture, Leslie Urteaga, is also involved in the lawsuit due to actions that allegedly allowed the global proliferation of slander against the authentic specimens and the scientists studying them. The plaintiffs further allege that the Ministry of Culture omitted the fact that the person who provided the counterfeit objects had stated that they were artisanal objects. If awarded, the $300 million from the lawsuit will be used to fund the construction of a museum in the Palpa and Nazca regions of Peru, as requested by the plaintiff, Jaime Maussan, with the intention of benefiting the people of Peru and all of humanity. | ||
=== Why are they called buddies? === | |||
During the Mexican congressional hearing, the English subtitles provided for the live stream erroneously autocorrected the phrase "alien bodies" to "alien buddies." They’ve been the buddies ever since. |
Revision as of 05:48, 11 April 2024
What are they?
The Nazca Mummies are a collection of ancient bodies discovered in the Nazca region of Peru. Unearthed in a series of underground tunnels in 2015, these mummies were found near the Nazca Lines, famous for their geoglyphs.
How were they discovered?
In 2015, a Peruvian huaquero (grave robber) discovered three mummies ranging from 40cm to 61cm in length while searching through caves near the Nazca Lines. The grave robber, who happened to be friends with a doctor at the University of Inka in Lima, Peru, sold the specimens to the doctor for research purposes.
How old are they?
Carbon-14 dating has been performed on multiple specimens. While the age varies among the samples, the results generally indicate a range between 750 CE and 1,300 CE.
Why are they covered in white powder?
The bodies are covered in a white powder because they were buried in diatomaceous earth. This natural, powdery substance is known for its moisture-absorbing qualities, which helped preserve the mummies by drawing moisture away from the bodies and creating a dry environment that inhibits decay and bacterial growth.
Is Jaime Maussan a hoaxer?
Jaime Maussan, a Mexican journalist and ufologist known for hosting the TV show "Tercer Milenio," has a polarizing reputation within the paranormal community. While he commands a dedicated following, critics have accused him of promoting unverified and occasionally debunked stories. However, despite instances where material he showcased was later identified as hoaxes or misinterpretations, there is no evidence to suggest that Maussan is a hoaxer who deliberately fabricates stories. His interest appears to lie in exploring and presenting anomalous phenomena to his audience, as exemplified by his involvement in the Nazca Mummies case starting in 2017, two years after their initial discovery.
Are they glued together animal bones?
Multiple intact bodies have been subjected to X-ray, CT scan, and fluoroscopy imaging. The results consistently demonstrate that the skeletal structures are complete and undamaged, without any evidence of dissection or reassembly. Once a bone has been severed, it is not possible to reconstruct it into a cohesive form without leaving clear indications of the alterations, which would be readily apparent in the imaging studies.
Where did the fake bodies debunk story originate?
In 2018, Paul Ronceros, also known as "Krawix," provided counterfeit specimens to the Ministry of Culture of Peru, acknowledging that the objects had been altered. A research team headed by Flavio Estrada analyzed these specimens and concluded that they were fabricated using "adhesive, animal bones, and various other materials." The findings were then sensationalized by an individual named "Luca McLovin," who claimed affiliation with the "Sociedad Secular Humanista de Peru." McLovin wrote the initial articles disseminating Estrada's analysis and criticizing Jaime Maussan and others associated with the authentic specimens. These articles were subsequently discovered by Alexander Sokolov, editor of "Anthropogenz.ru," who created a well-known debunking video on his YouTube channel, "Scientists Against Myths." The information presented in this video has been widely cited as evidence that the specimens were fabricated. However, it is important to note that the counterfeit specimens analyzed in these studies were distinct from the authentic specimens, and the conclusions drawn from the analysis of the counterfeit specimens do not necessarily apply to the authentic specimens.
How do you know Peru analyzed the wrong specimens?
In 2023, a lawsuit was filed against the Ministry of Culture of Peru. During the legal proceedings, Flavio Estrada was compelled to testify and admitted that he had never seen, interacted with, or conducted any analysis on the authentic specimens. The lawsuit has since expanded to seek damages of up to $300 million against Peru and its Ministry of Culture for alleged defamation against the scientists from Jaime Maussan's team and Maussan himself. The current head of the Ministry of Culture, Leslie Urteaga, is also involved in the lawsuit due to actions that allegedly allowed the global proliferation of slander against the authentic specimens and the scientists studying them. The plaintiffs further allege that the Ministry of Culture omitted the fact that the person who provided the counterfeit objects had stated that they were artisanal objects. If awarded, the $300 million from the lawsuit will be used to fund the construction of a museum in the Palpa and Nazca regions of Peru, as requested by the plaintiff, Jaime Maussan, with the intention of benefiting the people of Peru and all of humanity.
Why are they called buddies?
During the Mexican congressional hearing, the English subtitles provided for the live stream erroneously autocorrected the phrase "alien bodies" to "alien buddies." They’ve been the buddies ever since.